[1]陈卓识,侯龙清,袁晓铭,等.温州深软场地剪切波速实测误差及其对PGA影响研究[J].世界地震工程,2018,34(02):071-79.
 CHEN Zhuoshi,HOU Longqing,YUAN Xiaoming,et al.Research on test error of in-situ Shear-wave velocity and its related impact on PGA in Wenzhou Prefecture[J].,2018,34(02):071-79.
点击复制

温州深软场地剪切波速实测误差及其对PGA影响研究
分享到:

《世界地震工程》[ISSN:/CN:]

卷:
34
期数:
2018年02期
页码:
071-79
栏目:
出版日期:
2018-11-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on test error of in-situ Shear-wave velocity and its related impact on PGA in Wenzhou Prefecture
作者:
陈卓识1 侯龙清2 袁晓铭1 李楠3
1. 中国地震局工程力学研究所, 中国地震局地震工程与工程振动重点实验室, 黑龙江 哈尔滨 150080;
2. 东华理工大学 建筑工程学院, 江西 抚州 344000;
3. 辽宁省建设科学研究院有限责任公司, 辽宁 沈阳 110020
Author(s):
CHEN Zhuoshi1 HOU Longqing2 YUAN Xiaoming1 LI Nan3
1. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration of CEA, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin 150080, China;
2. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, East China University of Technolo
关键词:
温州深软场地剪切波速实测误差PGA
Keywords:
Wenzhou prefecturesoft-deep siteshear-wave velocityin-situ test errorPGA
分类号:
P315.9
摘要:
该研究在温州两个深软土层场地上完成了剪切波速测试误差专项实验,统计拟合了误差分布规律并研究了其对PGA的影响,得到结论:每米深度上的实测误差基本符合标准正态分布,温州地区深软场地的测试误差与我国其他几个地区覆盖土层较浅场地上的每米实测误差程度基本相同;两个场地上各深度的误差标准差大致相同,约为16%;实测误差对PGA影响明显,误差取1倍标准差时PGA的变化程度可能达到30%,取2倍标准差时可能高达45%;PGA的变化程度受输入地震动的频率特性制约,长周期频率成分对深软场地计算结果的影响明显。
Abstract:
This paper carried out a special experiment of test error of in-situ shear-wave velocity at two deep-soft sites in Wenzhou. By finishing the research on statistical rule of test error and its related effect on PGA, the conclusions are as followed. Per-meter test error obeys the normal distribution and remains at the similar deviation level which compares to some other shallow soil sites. The standard deviation(SD) of per-metertest error is about 16%.Test error has significate impact on PGA:1-time SD may shift 30% of PGA. When that turns to twice SD, the PGA variation would even high up to 45%. The change of PGA is highly related to the frequency band of the input ground motion. When considering the test error, long-period component has great impact on PGA of these two deep-soft sites.

参考文献/References:

[1] 高玉峰,刘汉龙. 合肥膨胀土剪切波速的特征分析[J].岩土工程学报,2003,3:371-373. GAO Yufeng, LIU Hanlong. Study on shear wave velocities in expansive soils of Hefei[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2003,3:371-373.
[2] 刘红帅,郑桐,齐文浩,等,常规土类剪切波速与埋深的关系分析[J].岩土工程学报,2010,32(7):1142-1149. LIU Hongshuai, ZHENG Tong, QI Wenhao, et al. Relationship between shear wave velocity and depth of conventional soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010,32(7):1142-1149. (in Chinese)
[3] 邱志刚,薄景山,罗奇峰.土壤剪切波速与埋深关系的统计分析[J].世界地震工程,2011,27(3):81-88. QIU Zhigang,BO Jingshan,LUO Qifeng. Statistical analysis of relationship between shear wave velocity and depth of soil[J].World Earthquake Engineering, 2011.27(3):81-88. (in Chinese)
[4] 张忠利. 建设场地剪切波速的统计分析[D].哈尔滨:中国地震局工程力学研究所,2008. ZHANG Zhongli. Statistical analysis of shear wave velocity in construction sites[D]. Harbin, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration.2008.(in Chinese)
[5] 董菲蕃,陈国兴,金丹丹. 福建沿海3个盆地的土层剪切波速与深度的统计关系[J].岩土工程学报,2013,35(S2):145-151. DONG Feifan, CHEN Guoxing, JIN Dandan, Statistical relation between shear wave velocity and depth of soils in three basins in coastal area of Fujian province[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. 2013,35(S2):145-151.
[6] 张小平,马顺,金源,等, 大连地区工程场地各类岩土剪切波速的变化特征分析[J].防灾减灾学报,2012,28(4):7-11. ZHANG Xiaoping, MA Shun, JIN Yuan, et al. Variation characteristic analysis of shear wave velocity by various types of soil on sites in Dalian region[J].Journal of Diasaster Prevention and Reduction. 2012,28(4):7-11.
[7] KWOK Annie OL, STEWART Jonathan P, HASHASH Youssef M A. Nonlinear ground-response analysis of turkey flat shallow stiff-soil site to strong ground motion[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2008,98:331-343.
[8] XIA J,MILLER RD, PARKCB,et al. Comparing shear-wave velocity profiles inverted from multichannel surface wave with borehole measurements[J]. Soil Dyn.Earthq.Eng,2002,22:181-190.
[9] GAROFALO F, FOTI S, HOLLENDER F, et al.Inter P project:Comparison of invasive and non-invasive methods for seismic site characterization. Part I:Intra-comparison of surface wave methods[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2016, 82:222-240.
[10] GAROFALOF, FOTIS, HOLLENDERF, et al. Inter P project:Comparison of invasive and non-invasive methods for seismic site characterization. Part Ⅱ:Inter-comparison between surface-wave and borehole methods[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2016, 82:241-254.
[11] REAL CR.Turkey Flat, USA site effects test area:report 2, site characterization,1988.
[12] BOORE D M. Paper 103, Determining subsurface shear-wave velocities:a review[R]. 3rd International Symposium on the Effect of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion, Grenoble, France, 30 August-1 September, 2006.
[13] MARTIN A J, DIEHLJ G. Practical experience using a simplified procedure to measure average shear-wave velocity to a depth of 30 meters (VS30)[R]. In 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, 1-6 August 2004.
[14] ASTENM W,BOORE D M. Comparison of shear-velocity profilesof unconsolidated sediments near the Coyote borehole(CCOC) measured with fourteen invasive and non-invasive methods[R]. U.S. Geo.Surv. Open-File Rept. 2005.
[15] THOMPSONE M,BAISE L G, KAYEN R E. Spatial correlationof shear-wave velocity in the San Francisco Bay area sediments[J]. Soil. Dyn. Earthq. 2007, 27:144-152.
[16] MAROSIK T, HILTUNEN D R. Characterization of spectral analysisof surface waves shear wave velocity measurement uncertainty[J]. Geotech and Geoenviron. Eng.130, 2004, No.10,1034-1041.
[17] THELEN W A, CLARKM, LOPEZ C T, et al. A transect of 200 shallow shear-velocity profiles across the Los Angeles Basin[J].Bull.Seismol. Soc. Am.2006.96:1055-1067.
[18] MAHMOUD NH, KARRAY M.Shear wave velocity as a geotechnical parameter:an overview[J].Can. Geotech. J. 2015, 52:1-21.
[19] 袁晓铭,孙锐,孙静,等. 常规土类动剪切模量比和阻尼比试验研究[J].地震工程与工程振动, 2000, 20(4):133-140. YUAN Xiaoming, SUN Jing, SUN Rui, etal. Laboratoryexperimentalstudy on dynamic shear modulus ratio and damping ratio of soils[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration. 2000,20(4):133-140. (in Chinese)
[20] 孙锐,袁晓铭,刘晓健.动剪切模量比与剪切波速对地震动影响及等量关系研究[J].岩土工程学,2009, 31(8):1267-1274. SUN Rui, YUAN Xiaoming, LIU Xiaojian.Effects of dynamic shear modulus ratio and velocity on surface ground motionand their equivalent relations[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2009,31(8):1267-1274.(in Chinese)
[21] 刘红帅,薄景山,吴兆营,等.土体参数对地表加速度峰值和反应谱的影响[J]. 地震研究,2005,28(2):167-171. LIU Hongshuai, BO Jingshan, WU Zhaoying, et al. Effects of soil parameters on ground surface acceleration peak and response spectra[J]. Journal of Seismological Research, 2005,28(2):167-171. (in Chinese)
[22] 李小军,彭青. 不同类别场地地震动参数的计算分析,地震工程与工程振动,2001,21(1):29-36. LI Xiaojun, PENG Qing. Calculation and analysis of earthquake ground motion parameters for different site categories[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration. 2001,21(1):29-36. (in Chinese)
[23] 曹均锋,冯伟栋,孟凡月,等. 剪切波速对场地地表地震动参数的影响[J].震灾防御技术,2013,8(3):252-260. CAO Junfeng, FENG Weidong, MENG Fanyue,et al. Effect of shear wave velocity on the ground motion parameters of site surface[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 2013,8(3):252-260. (in Chinese)
[24] 邱志刚,,薄景山,罗奇峰. 土壤剪切波速与埋深关系的统计分析[J]. 世界地震工程, 2011, 27(3):81-88. QIU Zhigang,BO Jingshan,LUO Qifeng. Statistical analysis of relationship between shear wave velocity and depth of soil[J]. World Earthquake Engineering, 2011, 27(3):81-88(in Chinese)
[25] 高玉峰,刘汉龙,朱伟,等.剪切波速对砂土层地震反应的影响[J].工程勘察,2001,1:39-42. GAO Yufeng, LIU Hanlong, ZHU Wei, et al. Effect of shear? wave velocity on the seismic response of sand ground[J]. Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying, 2001, 1:39-42.
[26] 陈卓识.现场剪切波速测试误差及其对地震动影响研究[D],中国地震局工程力学研究所,2015. CHEN Zhuoshi. The study of situ shear wave velocity test error and its effects on ground motion[D]. Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, 2015.(in Chinese)
[27] GB50011-2010建筑抗震设计规范[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2010. GB50011-2010 Code for Seismic Design of Buildings[S]. Beijing:China Architecture and Building Press, 2010.(in Chinese)
[28] MENDENHALLWilliam, SINICHTerry.统计学(原书第五版),机械工业出版社,2014.北京.

相似文献/References:

[1]张博,宰金珉,庄海洋.深软场地上考虑土-结构相互作用的斜拉桥被动控制分析[J].世界地震工程,2009,(01):057.
 ZHANG Bo,ZAI Jinmin,ZHUANG Haiyang.Analysis of passive control of cable-stayed bridge on deep soft site considering soil-structure interaction[J].,2009,(02):057.
[2]战吉艳,陈国兴,刘建达.苏州城区深软场地土剪切波速与土层深度的经验关系[J].世界地震工程,2009,(02):011.
 ZHAN Jiyan,CHEN Guoxing,LIU Jianda.Empirical relationship between shear wave velocity and soil depth on deep soft sites in urban area of Suzhou city[J].,2009,(02):011.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2017-08-03;改回日期:2018-02-11。
基金项目:国家重点研发计划政府间国际科技创新合作重点专项(2016YFE0105500),黑龙江省自然科学基金(QC2017037),国家自然科学基金(41602321)
作者简介:陈卓识(1984-),男,助理研究员,博士,主要从事岩土工程现场测试、土动力学研究.E-mail:various@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01